Skip to content
Back
Jun 22, 202625 min read

Compare the 9 best click fraud detection tools in 2026 — Lunio, CHEQ, TrafficGuard, DataDome, Anura & more — ranked across 8 criteria, with the best pick for each buyer profile.

The 9 Best Click Fraud Detection Tools in 2026, Ranked and Compared

If your paid media performance is dropping due to invalid traffic (IVT), it’s important to find the right click fraud detection tool for your business. Here, you’ll discover the 9 best click fraud detection tools ranked and compared against 8 essential criteria, so you can find out which option is right for you.

Discover the best click fraud protection software, find out how these click fraud prevention platforms work, and how to choose your ideal invalid traffic detection tool in 2026.

Key takeaways

  • There’s no universal winner — the best click fraud protection software for you depends on your ad spend, channel mix, and whether your team is marketing-led or security-led.
  • While they’re often lumped together, true PPC click fraud tools are different from payment fraud and bot mitigation solutions. This list only includes the top click fraud detection tools that work for performance marketers.
  • We’ve based our evaluations on 8 essential criteria. Against these, Lunio comes out on top as the best click fraud detection tool for in-house performance marketers spending $1M+ annually on lead gen and high CPC industries every year. It’s built for marketers, uses the most sophisticated detection methods, and monitors 100% of your traffic to optimize your performance marketing efficiency.
  • Other tools are better suited for marketers seeking coverage for mobile app installs and programmatic campaigns; small to medium sized businesses; and those who want full-stack cybersecurity solutions.

Introduction

Advertisers everywhere are dealing with increased CPAs, contaminated data, and CRMs filled with spam leads, thanks to invalid traffic. And with IVT on the rise, it’s time to invest in click fraud protection for your paid media campaigns.

But trawling through a dozen different websites to find the best click fraud detection tool is time-consuming and doesn’t guarantee results. There isn’t a universal winner — the best click fraud protection software for your business depends on your unique needs. That’s why we’ve compared and ranked these tools using specific criteria to define exactly who they work for and why.

The best click fraud detection tools in 2026 include Lunio, CHEQ, DataDome, TrafficGuard, Anura, ClickCease, Fraud0, ClickGuard, and Clixtell. Below, you’ll learn more about the 8 evaluation criteria we used to rank these tools, then find out how each tool measures up against the rest.

How we ranked these click fraud detection tools — our 8 evaluation criteria

For total transparency, we’re sharing exactly how we’ve identified and ranked the top click fraud detection tools. Here are the evaluation criteria we’ve used, and what ‘good’ looks like for each:

  • Machine learning (ML) sophistication — Rules-based filters are no longer enough to effectively reduce click fraud. Strong ML engines identify non-human behaviors in sophisticated invalid traffic (SIVT) and are trained on actual conversion data.
  • False positive rate — Good vendors have a low false positive rate (<1%). Red flags include vague ‘AI-powered’ detection claims and no published false positive rates.
  • Integrations — The best tools offer official ad platform API integrations. Reliance on manual exclusion lists and CSV updates is a red flag (not least due to Google’s 500 IP exclusion limit).
  • Pricing transparency — Pricing models should be clear and fair, with the best options based on traffic volumes. Red flags include pricing based on percentage-of-spend (which creates incompatible incentives for the vendor) and click volumes (which penalizes growth).
  • Account management model — Account managers who are paid media specialists provide more value than generic customer service managers.
  • Compliance — Adherence to specific compliance frameworks ensures information security, which is essential for complying with strict data protection regulations.
  • Reporting depth — Granular reporting (including campaign, channel, and geo-level breakdowns) gives marketers better traffic insights.
  • Platform coverage — We assess the depth of each tool (i.e. which channels it covers) as well as the breadth (i.e. which campaign types it covers). The best click fraud detection tools offer depth where you’re actually spending your budget.

See how each invalid traffic detection tool shapes up against these criteria below.

The 9 best click fraud detection tools in 2026 — at a glance

In the table below, we compare each of the 9 best click fraud detection tools, so you can shortlist your top contenders (and exclude the solutions that probably aren’t for you).

Tool

Best for

Detection approach

Platform coverage

Pricing model

Standout strength

Watch out for

Lunio

In-house performance marketers running high-spend campaigns in lead gen and high CPC sectors

Real-time ML behavioral analysis + rules-based filters

Paid search, paid social, automated campaigns + display campaigns

Based on value + required channel coverage

Designed for marketers, giving you actionable insights to improve overall PPC performance

Not usually cost effective for those with a PPC budget of less than $500 per month

CHEQ

Enterprises seeking an all-in-one cybersecurity + ad verification tool

ML behavioral analysis + identity verification + broad cybersecurity threat detection

Paid search, paid social, + display campaigns

Not published

Broad feature set with many add-ons and extras compared with other tools

Built for cybersecurity professionals rather than performance marketers

TrafficGuard

Mobile app install campaigns

Real-time ML behavioral analysis + rules-based filters

Google, Meta, affiliate campaigns, mobile app installs

Based on ad spend + coverage required

Ideal for industries where IVT affects mobile app installs, such as gaming and gambling

High breadth may result in less marketer-specific depth

DataDome

Enterprises seeking full digital fraud protection

Real-time ML behavioral analysis + rules-based filters

Not published

Pricing based on monthly traffic volume

Protects your full digital infrastructure including websites, apps + APIs

Some users report complex implementation and high pricing over time

Anura

Affiliate marketers, lead buyers + media buyers who need to verify traffic quality

Not published

Paid search, paid social, programmatic, affiliate + search arbitrage

Not published

Claims very high accuracy (although methodology isn’t published). Strong for affiliate campaigns

Limited visibility of detection method and pricing

ClickGuard

Hands-on PPC managers seeking granular insights + customizable controls

Customizable rules-based filters + behavioral analysis for some channels

Google, Meta + Microsoft

Based on ad spend + coverage required

Custom rules engine gives marketers control over what traffic is excluded

Limited coverage for social channels. Vague details on how detection works

ClickCease

SMBs and local service advertisers using Google + Meta

Real-time traffic analysis + rules-based filters

Google, Meta + Microsoft

Based on monthly traffic volume + features required

Pricing is accessible for those with smaller budgets

Detection mostly limited to rules-based filters. Limited coverage for social channels

Clixtell

SMBs + local service advertisers that also need call tracking

Machine learning + customizable rules-based filters

Google + Bing

Based on features + click volume

Call tracking available alongside click fraud detection

Click-based pricing penalizes growth. Limited coverage depth

Fraud0

GDPR-conscious advertisers who prioritize privacy-first detection + those seeking ad platform refunds

Behavioral analysis + rules-based filters

Google, Meta + Microsoft

Based on monthly traffic volume

Strong privacy profile that’s fully GDPR-compliant

Minimal features + limited coverage for social channels

The best click fraud protection software, ranked and compared

Read more about each of these click fraud tools for performance marketers and how they meet our key evaluation criteria below.

1. Lunio

Lunio scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

5

5

4.5

5

5

4.5

3.5

4.5

4.63

About Lunio: Formerly known as PPC Protect, Lunio is an invalid traffic protection tool that analyzes traffic in real-time and blocks IVT interactions before the click. Unlike other tools, it’s not a repurposed cybersecurity platform — it’s built specifically for performance marketers.

Best for: Lunio is the best click fraud detection tool for in-house performance marketers running high-spend lead generation campaigns, as well as brands working in high CPC industries like B2B SaaS, finance, and travel.

These advertisers are often targeted by sophisticated invalid traffic, but Lunio’s machine learning-powered behavioral analysis tools can detect and block even the most advanced threats before the click.

Strengths: Machine learning sophistication, false positive rate, integrations, account management model, compliance, reporting depth

Because Lunio is built for performance marketers, it has all the major features required to optimize results, protect your data, and reduce wasted ad spend. It offers granular insights that can boost performance beyond just eliminating IVT. And with a false positive rate of less than 1%, genuine leads can seamlessly interact with your ads.

Lunio adheres to multiple compliance frameworks, including GDPR, ISO 27001, and SOC 2. And there’s no need for developers or security teams to implement Lunio — it takes less than 1 hour to deploy, with no need for cookies or other dependencies. It integrates with all major ad platforms via API, so there’s no manual CSV management involved.

Lunio also assigns each customer a paid media specialist to oversee their account, giving you access to their knowledge and experience in the industry.

Limitations: Pricing transparency, platform coverage

Lunio has fairly limited coverage for mobile app installs and programmatic advertisers. Additionally, Lunio isn’t designed to offer bot protection across your entire online presence.

You’ll need to book a demo to get more information about Lunio’s pricing (although it’s worth noting pricing was a key factor in Lunio being named #1 G2 Leader for Click Fraud, along with overall user satisfaction and implementation ease).

Consider another tool if: Your ad budget is low (less than $500 per month); you’re looking for a full-stack cybersecurity tool; or you primarily need protection for mobile app install or programmatic campaigns.

Lunio offers a free 14-day traffic audit to uncover how much IVT is affecting your campaigns. Book your free traffic audit to find out more.

2. CHEQ

CHEQ scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

4

5

4.5

3.5

5

4

1

5

4

About CHEQ: CHEQ offers a full-stack suite of cybersecurity tools to protect your entire online estate from IVT and other malicious entities. It also offers additional tools like compliance management and API protection.

Best for: CHEQ is the best IVT detection tool for companies who want an all-inclusive cybersecurity package that goes beyond click fraud protection.

Strengths: Machine learning sophistication, false positive rate, integrations, compliance, platform coverage, reporting depth

CHEQ offers multiple cybersecurity tools to protect various digital assets, including paid media campaigns. Its broad feature set includes more tools than most other platforms on this list. It also meets all major compliance standards, including SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, and CCPA.

CHEQ uses advanced behavioral analysis methods to detect and prevent IVT. It claims a 99.2% accuracy rate, giving this platform a competitive false positive rate of just 0.8%. CHEQ covers all major ad platforms, including Google, Microsoft, Meta, LinkedIn, and TikTok, as well as some analytics platforms. You can also access detailed reports for a more in-depth look at your traffic with CHEQ.

Limitations: Pricing transparency, account management model

CHEQ doesn’t publish any information about its pricing model, so costs are unclear. Additionally, because CHEQ is a broad cybersecurity platform, they don’t tend to assign customer support managers with PPC-specific knowledge. Some accounts don’t qualify for account management support at all.

Consider another tool if: You’re looking for click fraud protection specifically designed for PPC, along with support from paid media specialists.

3. DataDome

DataDome scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

4.5

5

3.5

3

4

3

4

4

3.89

About DataDome: DataDome is an AI-powered cyberfraud protection platform that detects and blocks malicious bots, fraud, and abusive traffic in real time. It secures your full digital estate, from websites to apps to APIs.

Best for: DataDome is an enterprise solution that’s best for businesses seeking cybersecurity protection across their digital assets.

Strengths: Machine learning sophistication, false positive rate, pricing transparency, compliance, platform coverage

DataDome uses a multi-layered AI-powered detection engine to identify highly sophisticated bot attacks. It has a false positive rate of less than 0.01%, and is compliant with SOC 2, CCPA, GDPR, as well as other national standards.

DataDome’s pricing is based on your monthly traffic volume, making it one of the fairest pricing models among these solutions.

Limitations: Integrations, account management model, reporting depth

DataDome is a cybersecurity platform remodelled as a click fraud solution, so implementation can be complex. While it can connect to other platforms (including ad channels) via API, you may need technical support to implement DataDome across your ad stack.

This also means other aspects of the platform — such as reports and account management — don’t necessarily reflect what performance marketers need beyond bot protection.

Consider another tool if: You’re looking for quick, simple setup, and features that are specifically designed for performance marketers.

4. TrafficGuard

TrafficGuard scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

4

5

4

3

4

2.5

4

3.5

3.75

About TrafficGuard: TrafficGuard is an ad fraud prevention platform for Google and Meta advertisers. As well as preventing click fraud, TrafficGuard also offers a detection-only plan so you can see the impact and cost of invalid traffic without actually blocking it.

Best for: TrafficGuard is the best click fraud detection tool for mobile user acquisition campaigns in Google, Meta, and Microsoft Ads.

Strengths: Machine learning sophistication, false positive rate, integrations, compliance, pricing transparency

While many platforms protect search and social, mobile app installs and affiliate campaigns aren’t always covered. TrafficGuard offers strong protection for brands advertising in these areas, such as gaming and gambling marketers.

Like most other high quality IVT prevention platforms, Traffic Guard uses behavioral signals to block bots in real-time. TrafficGuard also has a relatively low false positive rate of 0.04%, and adheres to major compliance frameworks including GDPR and CCPA. Pricing information is readily available on the TrafficGuard site.

Limitations: Account management model, platform coverage, reporting depth

TrafficGuard protects against IVT on Google Search, Performance Max, and Meta channels, as well as mobile user acquisition and affiliate campaigns. While this offers broader coverage than many other platforms, it’s not ideal for those who operate across channels beyond Google and Meta. And even if TrafficGuard suits your current setup, it may limit your PPC expansion.

To qualify for dedicated CSM support, you’ll need to be a TrafficGuard Scale customer, which costs more than TrafficGuard Shield.

Consider another tool if: You’re looking for a solution that covers a broad range of social channels, and/or you want dedicated support from a CSM who specializes in paid media.

5. Anura

Anura scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

3

5

4.5

4

2.5

3

1

3.5

3.31

About Anura: Anura claims to have one of the lowest false positive rates in the industry. It offers an accuracy guarantee of 99.999% across affiliate channels, programmatic, and search arbitrage.

Best for: Anura is one of the top click fraud solutions for affiliate marketers, as well as lead and media buyers seeking traffic quality verification.

Strengths: False positive rate, integrations, account management model, reporting depth, platform coverage

Anura’s flagship feature is its accuracy guarantee. Anura claims to be 99.999% accurate when identifying traffic as bad, indicating a very low false positive rate. Setup is easy, with installation via Google Tag Manager taking just 3 minutes (no tech team required).

All Anura customers are assigned a dedicated account manager. Though it’s unclear whether they have a paid media background, this is still a plus compared with solutions where only large accounts are supported by a CSM.

Covering affiliate marketing, search arbitrage, and programmatic advertising, Anura also has a broader scope than many other solutions, so may be a good fit for those in these niche industries.

Limitations: Machine learning sophistication, pricing transparency, compliance

Although Anura has multiple products that are said to block sophisticated IVT, it doesn’t appear to use ML to preempt threats, instead using scripts to stop IVT. You’ll also need to book a demo with Anura before you learn much about their pricing model.

Anura complies with SOC 2 and some minor compliance frameworks, but other major standards like GDPR, CCPA, and ISO 27001 are missing.

Consider another tool if: You want proven compliance with major standards; clarity on pricing before booking a demo; and a ML-based solution that detects SIVT based on behavioral signals.

6. ClickCease

ClickCease scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

2

1

4

4

4.5

3.5

5

2.5

3.31

About ClickCease: Formerly known as CHEQ Essentials, ClickCease is a click fraud detection tool owned by CHEQ, but it caters to a different market. While CHEQ offers a broad range of bot mitigation solutions to enterprises, ClickCease is focused on click fraud protection for paid media.

Best for: ClickCease is a good option for SMBs and local service advertisers who use Google and Meta.

Strengths: Integrations, pricing transparency, account management model, compliance, reporting depth

ClickCease offers easy integration via its custom API, dedicated account managers for all customers, and it adheres to all major compliance frameworks (including GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, and SOC 2). Additionally, its pricing model is based on monthly traffic volume and the features you need, so it’s easy to see how much ClickCease is likely to cost.

Limitations: Machine learning (ML) sophistication, false positive rate, platform coverage

ClickCease mostly uses rules-based filters like IP exclusions to protect your paid media, which aren’t the most reliable way to remove SIVT. Additionally, it only covers Google, Meta, and Microsoft Ads, so it’s not ideal for those with extensive paid social campaigns. ClickCease’s false positive rate hasn’t been published.

Consider another tool if: You want an invalid traffic detection tool that can identify and block unknown and sophisticated bots, and good coverage for a wide range of paid media channels.

7. Fraud0

Fraud0 scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

4.5

1

4

1

4

3.5

4.5

2.5

3.13

About Fraud0: Fraud0 bills itself as an audit platform for PPC marketers. They audit billing errors, data quality and invalid traffic to ensure you’re not being overcharged by ad platforms.

Best for: Companies who want to automate refund claims from ad platforms, and those who require strict GDPR compliance.

Strengths: Machine learning sophistication, integrations, compliance, pricing transparency, reporting depth

Fraud0 publishes its detection methodology in detail, offering insights into how its behavioral analysis and real-time IVT identification methods work. It connects to your ad channels with swift, non-technical setup, making integration simple. Fraud0’s pricing model is based on monthly traffic volumes and features required, so it’s easy to understand (although some features are only available to Enterprise users).

Fraud0 doesn’t rely on cookies to work, making it a strong option for compliance-minded customers.

Limitations: False positive rate, account management model, platform coverage

Fraud0 only covers select paid media channels: Google, Meta, and Microsoft. It doesn’t indicate how many false positives it picks up, and you won’t get support from a CSM as standard.

Consider another tool if: You want good coverage across paid social channels, and/or support from a dedicated account manager.

8. ClickGuard

ClickGuard scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

2.5

1

3.5

1

3.5

4

4.5

2.5

2.81

About ClickGuard: ClickGuard’s click fraud protection solution built by marketers, so it has lots of built-in PPC essentials. Users can customize rules themselves, rather than relying on pre-built filters.

Best for: ClickGuard is the best IVT detection tool for PPC marketers seeking more customization capabilities from their click fraud protection software.

Strengths: Pricing transparency, integrations, compliance, reporting depth

Because ClickGuard is built by PPC marketers, it has many of the important reporting features advertisers rely on. Clear visual dashboards give you tons of information about campaign performance at a glance. It also complies with GDPR and SOC 2.

ClickGuard’s pricing is highly transparent. You can see current and potential future costs based on monthly ad spend in ClickGuard’s clear pricing plans.

Limitations: Machine learning sophistication, false positive rate, account management model, platform coverage

ClickGuard mainly uses rules-based filters, which don’t always remove the most advanced types of invalid traffic. There are some claims of ‘AI-powered technology’ but it’s not clear exactly how or where this is used.

ClickGuard only offers protection for Google, Meta, and Microsoft ads, which have the lowest IVT levels of all major platforms, according to our 2026 Global Invalid Traffic Report. So coverage is fairly limited. Additionally, ClickGuard doesn’t publish information about its account management model or false positive rate.

Consider another tool if: You need coverage that extends beyond Google, Meta, and Microsoft, and/or you’re seeking the most advanced IVT detection techniques.

9. Clixtell

Clixtell scorecard

Machine learning sophistication

False positive rate

Integrations

Account management model

Compliance

Reporting depth

Pricing transparency

Platform coverage

Overall score

Score

3.5

1

3

2

3

3

3.5

2

2.63

About Clixtell: Clixtell offers a click fraud prevention solution alongside site video recording and call recording, so you can monitor user behavior in real time while reducing the impact of IVT on your PPC performance.

Best for: Clixtell’s unique offering makes it a great option for local service advertisers who can benefit from call tracking, as well as small to medium sized businesses with relatively low click volumes.

Strengths: Machine learning sophistication, integrations, pricing transparency

Clixtell uses machine learning to identify and learn about bot traffic behavior. It also has a clear pricing structure based on click volume and the level of protection you want. Customers can also expect discounts when you lock in annually (although this may be a negative if you’re not ready to commit to a full year).

Limitations: False positive rate, account management model, compliance, reporting depth, platform coverage

Clixtell doesn’t publish a false positive rate, so it’s unclear what proportion of real customers are affected when using this software. Clixtell customers are also hampered by Clixtell’s platform coverage, as it only protects Google and Microsoft Ads, and reporting insights are limited.

Additionally, while Clixtell complies with GDPR, it doesn’t appear to be certified against any other major compliance frameworks. Only Agency-level users get a dedicated account manager.

Consider another tool if: You have a broad ad stack to cover; you need a solution with strong compliance credentials; or you’re looking for robust account management support.

How to choose the right click fraud tool for your situation

Not all click fraud solutions are suitable for all companies, agencies, or performance marketers. Here’s a breakdown of which click fraud tool is right for different advertiser profiles:

  • If you’re looking for a comprehensive click fraud tool designed specifically for in-house PPC advertisers, consider Lunio, ClickGuard, or ClickCease.
  • If you spend more than $1M on paid media annually, especially in lead gen or high CPC industries, consider Lunio.
  • If you’re looking for a good budget-friendly option that covers Google and Meta only, consider TrafficGuard or ClickCease.
  • If you need a full-stack cybersecurity solution that includes click fraud protection, consider CHEQ or DataDome.
  • If you want the support of a dedicated account manager with a background in paid media, consider Lunio.
  • If you need idiosyncratic features like call recording, affiliate fraud protection, or assistance with claiming refunds from ad platforms, consider Anura, Clixtell or Fraud0.

When you’re spending significant amounts on advertising, it’s important that your click fraud prevention platform can detect SIVT before the click, not just filter out known bad traffic.

This minimizes wasted ad spend and prevents data corruption, protecting future campaign performance and stacking your pipeline with genuine leads. That’s why high-spend in-house performance marketers trust Lunio.

Why performance marketers choose Lunio

Lunio is a marketer-first platform with a proven track record for generating optimal results for our customers. Canto saw their pipeline value increase by $350K in the first two months of using Lunio, along with a monthly ad spend saving of $67.4K.

Our advanced ML engine means Lunio can detect even the most sophisticated IVT across 100% of your traffic — no sampling required. Real users are protected, too, thanks to our competitive false positive rate (<1%). And our CSMs are paid media specialists who can provide unique value compared with generic account managers.

It’s easy to deploy Lunio across all your paid media channels — we’ll get you set up in less than 1 hour. As soon as your accounts are linked, you’ll start seeing real-time insights in our detailed traffic quality reports.

Lunio is the best click fraud prevention software for in-house performance marketers looking to eliminate junk leads from their CRM. If that sounds like you, get your free 14-day traffic audit to see how much IVT is affecting your PPC performance.

FAQ

Find out more about choosing the best click fraud detection tools in these frequently asked questions.

1. What's the difference between click fraud protection and bot management tools like DataDome?

The main goal of click fraud protection is to improve advertising efficiency, reduce wasted spend, and maintain clean data. Bot management systems are designed to prevent abuse such as web scraping and account takeover attacks, so they detect and mitigate automated traffic across websites, mobile apps, and APIs.

While both use similar techniques — such as device fingerprinting and behavioral analysis — bot management platforms generally provide broader protection than click fraud tools.

2. Do I need a third-party tool if Google already filters invalid clicks?

In most cases, yes. While Google sometimes offers Google Ads refunds (in ad credits, not cash) if it detects invalid traffic, it can’t always detect automated or agentic bots that infiltrate your campaigns. So relying on built-in filters is unlikely to yield good results.

Additionally, Google tends to refund invalid clicks detected after the click, by which point the damage is already done. Your data has already been corrupted with false signals, potentially damaging future performance. So it’s usually best to invest in a third-party click fraud detection tool that spots SIVT before the click.

3. Which click fraud tool is best for Google Ads lead gen?

Lunio is the best click fraud tool for Google Ads lead generation campaigns, as it detects and removes the most sophisticated IVT that can bypass standard filters and target your lead forms.

Using Lunio eliminates spam and junk leads, so lead gen companies don’t waste resources chasing leads that don’t exist.

4. How much does click fraud protection software cost?

Click fraud protection software pricing varies widely, with budget options available from just $49 per month, rising to thousands of dollars per month for multifunctional enterprise-level subscriptions.

Assess pricing model, scalability, features, and pricing transparency when considering the cost of your solution. Some tools seem affordable at first, but costs quickly rise as your traffic or click volumes increase.

Discuss your target spend and traffic volumes with potential providers to see how much each shortlisted solution could cost both now and in the future.

Free Calculator
Click Fraud Calculator Click fraud takes 7–15% of every ad budget. Find out yours.

60 seconds, no signup. Built on Lunio's analysis of 2.7B+ ad clicks. Find out your industry's invalid traffic rate, your wasted spend, and the revenue you could recover.

Step 1 of 3
Start with the basics.
$
Step 2 of 3
Pick your industry & CPC.
$
Industry · Platform · $0 annual spend
Click fraud is taking $0

from your business every year. That's $0 every month walking out the door — and another $0 every day you don't act.

Invalid clicks / yr
0
Wasted ad spend
$0
Invalid traffic
0%
Google won't fix this. Lunio will.

Run a free 14-day audit on your live account and see your real numbers — broken down by campaign, keyword, geo and domain.

Your actual IVT rate Top wasted-spend sources Recoverable revenue
Start my free audit →
No credit card 5-min setup Read-only access
After activation, Lunio customers see avg 13% higher on-page CVR and 7% lower CPL. Trusted by 1,400+ brands · 4.7 on G2.

Calculations based on Lunio's Global Invalid Traffic Report 2026. Eight industries shown use Lunio-measured rates; additional industries use Lunio-methodology estimates calibrated against comparable verticals. Lost revenue applies Lunio's conservative 3:1 ROAS baseline — every $1 of wasted ad spend equals roughly $3 in missed revenue. Actual results vary by account.

 

avatar
Rebecca Munton
Rebecca is a digital marketer and content writer who likes good tea and bad puns. She writes about maximising performance marketing efficiency for Lunio.

Table of Contents